Event Strategy Planner
Conference strategy

Plans a conference program: event selection, sponsorship ROI, speaking (CFP) submissions, booth strategy, and team preparation. Use when the user is choosing which events to attend or sponsor, submitting a CFP, or analyzing conference ROI.
---
name: conference-strategy
description: >-
Plans a conference program: event selection, sponsorship ROI, speaking (CFP)
submissions, booth strategy, and team preparation. Use when the user is
choosing which events to attend or sponsor, submitting a CFP, or analyzing
conference ROI. Triggers on: "conference strategy", "event planning", "trade
show strategy", "sponsorship ROI", "CFP submissions".
license: MIT
compatibility: Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Windsurf, Zed
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
author: LeadMagic
category: events
tags: [events, conferences, event-strategy, sponsorship, speaking]
frameworks:
- "Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall"
- "ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing"Overview
Conferences are the single biggest line item in many B2B marketing budgets — and the least measured. This skill covers event selection, sponsorship evaluation, speaking submission strategy, booth design, and team preparation to maximize ROI.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill conference-strategy -g -a claude-codenpx degit LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/events/conference-strategy#main ~/.claude/skills/conference-strategyConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md7.6 KB
Read SKILL.md here
Show the full text172 lines
Conference Strategy
Overview
Conferences are the single biggest line item in many B2B marketing budgets — and the least measured. This skill covers event selection, sponsorship evaluation, speaking submission strategy, booth design, and team preparation to maximize ROI.
Authoritative Foundations
- Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall — Measure events by the pipeline stages they create and accelerate, not by badge scans.
- ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing — Choose and staff events by target-account attendance, and pre-book meetings with named accounts.
- Chris Walker — Self-reported attribution — Add a 'How did you hear about us?' field so event influence that never appears in last-touch reporting is still captured.
When to Use
- "Plan our conference strategy"
- "Which events should we sponsor?"
- "Submit a CFP"
- "Conference ROI analysis"
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Event Selection Matrix
Score events on 5 dimensions (1-10 each):
- ICP concentration (×2): % of attendees matching your ICP. Check past attendee lists, ask peers who attended.
- Decision-maker presence (×1.5): Are buyers there or just practitioners? Practitioner conferences build brand; buyer conferences build pipeline.
- Competitor presence: If 3+ competitors sponsor/speak, you should too. If none, you might pioneer a category — or there's no market.
- Cost per qualified conversation: Total cost / expected qualified meetings. Target: <$500 per qualified meeting for $10K+ ACV products.
- Content/PR value: Speaking slot? Press coverage? Industry credibility?
Score >35: Sponsor/speak. Score 25-35: Attend only. Score <25: Skip.
Phase 2: Sponsorship Evaluation
- Booth: Only worth it if you have 2+ dedicated staff and a lead capture process. Badge-scanning without qualification = waste of money.
- Speaking slot: Highest ROI of any sponsorship. Negotiate it into your package. A 30-min talk is worth more than a 10x10 booth.
- Sponsored happy hour / dinner: High cost, high reward for relationship building. Invite specific target accounts, not open bar for randoms.
- Branding only: Logo on lanyard/tote bag. Low ROI unless you're a household name in the industry. Skip.
Phase 3: Speaking Submissions (CFP)
- Submit to 3-5 events: One talk abstract, customized per event theme
- Talk structure: Problem story → counterintuitive insight → framework → results data → specific takeaways. No product pitch.
- Co-speak with a customer: 3x acceptance rate vs solo. Event organizers love practitioner stories.
- Submit early: CFP deadlines are real. Late submissions are ignored.
- Rehearse: Do a dry run with internal team. Record it. Watch it. Fix it.
Phase 4: Booth Strategy
- Lead capture: Badge scan + 1 qualifier question ("What brings you to [Event]?" → scoring). No generic "tell me about your role."
- Booth staff: Train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry. No phones. No sitting. No eating. 2-hour shifts max (it's exhausting).
- Giveaway strategy: Something useful (charging brick > stress ball). Require badge scan to get it.
- Demo station: 1-2 dedicated demo stations with good chairs. 5-minute targeted demo, not a full product tour.
Phase 5: Post-Event Debrief
Within 48 hours of event end: what worked, what didn't, revenue influenced, cost per meeting. Update event scores for next year's selection.
Output Format
Conference strategy document with: event selection scores, sponsorship package negotiation points, speaking submission abstracts, booth plan, and post-event debrief template.
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- All required sections are complete
- Output matches the user's stated need
- Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations
- No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action
- Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual
Common Pitfalls
- No pre-event outreach. Showing up to a conference without booked meetings wastes the investment. Fix: scrape attendee lists, research targets, and book meetings 2-3 weeks before.
- Booth staff without training. Untrained staff give generic demos and fail to qualify. Fix: train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry before the event.
- No post-event follow-up system. Leads go cold within 48 hours. Fix: Day 1 personalized follow-up, Day 3 value-add, Day 7 soft CTA.
Implementation Depth
Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation.
Diagnostic Questions
- What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led?
- Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed?
- What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none?
- What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow?
- What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure?
Framework Application
Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill:
- B2B Event ROI Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Conference Strategy Playbook: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Bizzabo — Event Experience Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
Deliverable Standard
A strong output from this skill includes:
- A crisp diagnosis of the current situation
- A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list
- A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan
- A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators
- Risks and edge cases called out before execution
Adaptation Rules
- For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity.
- For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets.
- For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— Named frameworks and reference tablestemplates/output-template.md— Deliverable shell for agent outputscripts/check-output.py— Lightweight deliverable validator
Related Skills
- event-driven-outreach, field-marketing, pipeline-management, sales-enablement, partnership-strategy
| 1 | |
| 2 | name conference-strategy |
| 3 | description >- |
| 4 | Plans a conference program: event selection, sponsorship ROI, speaking (CFP) |
| 5 | submissions, booth strategy, and team preparation. Use when the user is |
| 6 | choosing which events to attend or sponsor, submitting a CFP, or analyzing |
| 7 | conference ROI. Triggers on: "conference strategy", "event planning", "trade |
| 8 | show strategy", "sponsorship ROI", "CFP submissions". |
| 9 | license MIT |
| 10 | compatibility Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Windsurf, Zed |
| 11 | metadata |
| 12 | version "1.0.0" |
| 13 | author LeadMagic |
| 14 | category events |
| 15 | tags [events, conferences, event-strategy, sponsorship, speaking] |
| 16 | frameworks |
| 17 | - "Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall" |
| 18 | - "ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing" |
| 19 | - "Chris Walker — Self-reported attribution" |
| 20 | related_skills |
| 21 | [ |
| 22 | event-driven-outreach, |
| 23 | field-marketing, |
| 24 | pipeline-management, |
| 25 | sales-enablement, |
| 26 | partnership-strategy, |
| 27 | ] |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | # Conference Strategy |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ## Overview |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Conferences are the single biggest line item in many B2B marketing budgets — |
| 35 | and the least measured. This skill covers event selection, sponsorship evaluation, |
| 36 | speaking submission strategy, booth design, and team preparation to maximize ROI. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ## Authoritative Foundations |
| 39 | **Forrester (SiriusDecisions) — Demand Waterfall** — Measure events by the pipeline stages they create and accelerate, not by badge scans. |
| 40 | **ITSMA — Account-Based Marketing** — Choose and staff events by target-account attendance, and pre-book meetings with named accounts. |
| 41 | **Chris Walker — Self-reported attribution** — Add a 'How did you hear about us?' field so event influence that never appears in last-touch reporting is still captured. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | ## When to Use |
| 44 | |
| 45 | "Plan our conference strategy" |
| 46 | "Which events should we sponsor?" |
| 47 | "Submit a CFP" |
| 48 | "Conference ROI analysis" |
| 49 | |
| 50 | ## Step-by-Step Process |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### Phase 1: Event Selection Matrix |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Score events on 5 dimensions (1-10 each): |
| 55 | |
| 56 | **ICP concentration (×2):** % of attendees matching your ICP. |
| 57 | Check past attendee lists, ask peers who attended. |
| 58 | **Decision-maker presence (×1.5):** Are buyers there or just practitioners? |
| 59 | Practitioner conferences build brand; buyer conferences build pipeline. |
| 60 | **Competitor presence:** If 3+ competitors sponsor/speak, you should too. |
| 61 | If none, you might pioneer a category — or there's no market. |
| 62 | **Cost per qualified conversation:** Total cost / expected qualified meetings. |
| 63 | Target: <$500 per qualified meeting for $10K+ ACV products. |
| 64 | **Content/PR value:** Speaking slot? Press coverage? Industry credibility? |
| 65 | |
| 66 | Score >35: Sponsor/speak. Score 25-35: Attend only. Score <25: Skip. |
| 67 | |
| 68 | ### Phase 2: Sponsorship Evaluation |
| 69 | |
| 70 | **Booth:** Only worth it if you have 2+ dedicated staff and a lead capture |
| 71 | process. Badge-scanning without qualification = waste of money. |
| 72 | **Speaking slot:** Highest ROI of any sponsorship. Negotiate it into your |
| 73 | package. A 30-min talk is worth more than a 10x10 booth. |
| 74 | **Sponsored happy hour / dinner:** High cost, high reward for relationship |
| 75 | building. Invite specific target accounts, not open bar for randoms. |
| 76 | **Branding only:** Logo on lanyard/tote bag. Low ROI unless you're a |
| 77 | household name in the industry. Skip. |
| 78 | |
| 79 | ### Phase 3: Speaking Submissions (CFP) |
| 80 | |
| 81 | **Submit to 3-5 events:** One talk abstract, customized per event theme |
| 82 | **Talk structure:** Problem story → counterintuitive insight → framework → |
| 83 | results data → specific takeaways. No product pitch. |
| 84 | **Co-speak with a customer:** 3x acceptance rate vs solo. Event organizers |
| 85 | love practitioner stories. |
| 86 | **Submit early:** CFP deadlines are real. Late submissions are ignored. |
| 87 | **Rehearse:** Do a dry run with internal team. Record it. Watch it. Fix it. |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ### Phase 4: Booth Strategy |
| 90 | |
| 91 | **Lead capture:** Badge scan + 1 qualifier question ("What brings you to |
| 92 | [Event]?" → scoring). No generic "tell me about your role." |
| 93 | **Booth staff:** Train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry. |
| 94 | No phones. No sitting. No eating. 2-hour shifts max (it's exhausting). |
| 95 | **Giveaway strategy:** Something useful (charging brick > stress ball). |
| 96 | Require badge scan to get it. |
| 97 | **Demo station:** 1-2 dedicated demo stations with good chairs. 5-minute |
| 98 | targeted demo, not a full product tour. |
| 99 | |
| 100 | ### Phase 5: Post-Event Debrief |
| 101 | |
| 102 | Within 48 hours of event end: what worked, what didn't, revenue influenced, |
| 103 | cost per meeting. Update event scores for next year's selection. |
| 104 | |
| 105 | ## Output Format |
| 106 | |
| 107 | Conference strategy document with: event selection scores, sponsorship package |
| 108 | negotiation points, speaking submission abstracts, booth plan, and post-event |
| 109 | debrief template. |
| 110 | |
| 111 | ## Quality Check |
| 112 | |
| 113 | Before delivering, verify: |
| 114 | |
| 115 | [ ] All required sections are complete |
| 116 | [ ] Output matches the user's stated need |
| 117 | [ ] Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations |
| 118 | [ ] No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action |
| 119 | [ ] Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual |
| 120 | |
| 121 | ## Common Pitfalls |
| 122 | |
| 123 | **No pre-event outreach.** Showing up to a conference without booked meetings wastes the investment. Fix: scrape attendee lists, research targets, and book meetings 2-3 weeks before. |
| 124 | **Booth staff without training.** Untrained staff give generic demos and fail to qualify. Fix: train on qualification questions, demo flow, and data entry before the event. |
| 125 | **No post-event follow-up system.** Leads go cold within 48 hours. Fix: Day 1 personalized follow-up, Day 3 value-add, Day 7 soft CTA. |
| 126 | |
| 127 | ## Implementation Depth |
| 128 | |
| 129 | Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation. |
| 130 | |
| 131 | ### Diagnostic Questions |
| 132 | |
| 133 | What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led? |
| 134 | Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed? |
| 135 | What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none? |
| 136 | What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow? |
| 137 | What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure? |
| 138 | |
| 139 | ### Framework Application |
| 140 | |
| 141 | Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill: |
| 142 | |
| 143 | B2B Event ROI Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 144 | Conference Strategy Playbook: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 145 | Bizzabo — Event Experience Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 146 | |
| 147 | ### Deliverable Standard |
| 148 | |
| 149 | A strong output from this skill includes: |
| 150 | |
| 151 | A crisp diagnosis of the current situation |
| 152 | A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list |
| 153 | A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan |
| 154 | A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators |
| 155 | Risks and edge cases called out before execution |
| 156 | |
| 157 | ### Adaptation Rules |
| 158 | |
| 159 | For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity. |
| 160 | For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets. |
| 161 | For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements. |
| 162 | |
| 163 | ## Execution Artifacts |
| 164 | |
| 165 | `references/framework-notes.md` — Named frameworks and reference tables |
| 166 | `templates/output-template.md` — Deliverable shell for agent output |
| 167 | `scripts/check-output.py` — Lightweight deliverable validator |
| 168 | |
| 169 | ## Related Skills |
| 170 | |
| 171 | event-driven-outreach, field-marketing, pipeline-management, sales-enablement, partnership-strategy |
| 172 |
Details
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 62
- Checked
- Source
- LeadMagic/gtm-skills ↗
- Creator
- LeadMagic · 129 listings
Similar skills
See all →
AgentPhase 2: Foundation Scaffolding
AgentNEXUS Network Framework
SkillAnsoff Matrix Generator
SkillArchitecture Advisor
SkillCareer Skills Translator
SkillMarketing Skills CollectionMore from LeadMagic
SkillStrategic Account Marketing
SkillCluster Account Marketing
SkillProgrammatic Account Targeting
SkillAccount Strategy Designer
SkillTarget Account Selector