README Composer

Crafting effective readmes

by davila7 · MIT license · ★ 32,299 on GitHub

Crafting effective readmes cover

Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.

---
name: crafting-effective-readmes
description: Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
---

# Crafting Effective READMEs

## Overview

READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder.

**Always ask:** Who will read this, and what do they need to know?

## Process

### Step 1: Identify the Task

**Ask:** "What README task are you working on?"

Overview

READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill crafting-effective-readmes -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (degit)npx degit davila7/claude-code-templates/cli-tool/components/skills/productivity/crafting-effective-readmes#main ~/.claude/skills/crafting-effective-readmes
Claude.ai / desktopZip the folder and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB
Read SKILL.md here
davila7/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text79 lines

Crafting Effective READMEs

Overview

READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder.

Always ask: Who will read this, and what do they need to know?

Process

Step 1: Identify the Task

Ask: "What README task are you working on?"

Task When
Creating New project, no README yet
Adding Need to document something new
Updating Capabilities changed, content is stale
Reviewing Checking if README is still accurate
Step 2: Task-Specific Questions

Creating initial README:

  1. What type of project? (see Project Types below)
  2. What problem does this solve in one sentence?
  3. What's the quickest path to "it works"?
  4. Anything notable to highlight?

Adding a section:

  1. What needs documenting?
  2. Where should it go in the existing structure?
  3. Who needs this info most?

Updating existing content:

  1. What changed?
  2. Read current README, identify stale sections
  3. Propose specific edits

Reviewing/refreshing:

  1. Read current README
  2. Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.)
  3. Flag outdated sections
  4. Update "Last reviewed" date if present
Step 3: Always Ask

After drafting, ask: "Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"

Project Types

Type Audience Key Sections Template
Open Source Contributors, users worldwide Install, Usage, Contributing, License templates/oss.md
Personal Future you, portfolio viewers What it does, Tech stack, Learnings templates/personal.md
Internal Teammates, new hires Setup, Architecture, Runbooks templates/internal.md
Config Future you (confused) What's here, Why, How to extend, Gotchas templates/xdg-config.md

Ask the user if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything.

Essential Sections (All Types)

Every README needs at minimum:

  1. Name - Self-explanatory title
  2. Description - What + why in 1-2 sentences
  3. Usage - How to use it (examples help)

References

  • section-checklist.md - Which sections to include by project type
  • style-guide.md - Common README mistakes and prose guidance
  • using-references.md - Guide to deeper reference materials
1---
2name: crafting-effective-readmes
3description: Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
4---
5 
6# Crafting Effective READMEs
7 
8## Overview
9 
10READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder.
11 
12**Always ask:** Who will read this, and what do they need to know?
13 
14## Process
15 
16### Step 1: Identify the Task
17 
18**Ask:** "What README task are you working on?"
19 
20| Task | When |
21|------|------|
22| **Creating** | New project, no README yet |
23| **Adding** | Need to document something new |
24| **Updating** | Capabilities changed, content is stale |
25| **Reviewing** | Checking if README is still accurate |
26 
27### Step 2: Task-Specific Questions
28 
29**Creating initial README:**
301. What type of project? (see Project Types below)
312. What problem does this solve in one sentence?
323. What's the quickest path to "it works"?
334. Anything notable to highlight?
34 
35**Adding a section:**
361. What needs documenting?
372. Where should it go in the existing structure?
383. Who needs this info most?
39 
40**Updating existing content:**
411. What changed?
422. Read current README, identify stale sections
433. Propose specific edits
44 
45**Reviewing/refreshing:**
461. Read current README
472. Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.)
483. Flag outdated sections
494. Update "Last reviewed" date if present
50 
51### Step 3: Always Ask
52 
53After drafting, ask: **"Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"**
54 
55## Project Types
56 
57| Type | Audience | Key Sections | Template |
58|------|----------|--------------|----------|
59| **Open Source** | Contributors, users worldwide | Install, Usage, Contributing, License | `templates/oss.md` |
60| **Personal** | Future you, portfolio viewers | What it does, Tech stack, Learnings | `templates/personal.md` |
61| **Internal** | Teammates, new hires | Setup, Architecture, Runbooks | `templates/internal.md` |
62| **Config** | Future you (confused) | What's here, Why, How to extend, Gotchas | `templates/xdg-config.md` |
63 
64**Ask the user** if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything.
65 
66## Essential Sections (All Types)
67 
68Every README needs at minimum:
69 
701. **Name** - Self-explanatory title
712. **Description** - What + why in 1-2 sentences
723. **Usage** - How to use it (examples help)
73 
74## References
75 
76- `section-checklist.md` - Which sections to include by project type
77- `style-guide.md` - Common README mistakes and prose guidance
78- `using-references.md` - Guide to deeper reference materials
79 
View all files on GitHub →

Details

License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 32,299
Checked
Source
davila7/claude-code-templates ↗
Creator
davila7 · 212 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →

More from davila7

Skill2D Game Developmentdavila7/claude-code-templates · by davila72D game development principles. Sprites, tilemaps, physics, camera.★ 32.3k GitHub starsSkill3D Game Development Principlesdavila7/claude-code-templates · by davila73D game development principles. Rendering, shaders, physics, cameras.★ 32.3k GitHub starsSkill3D Web Experience Builderdavila7/claude-code-templates · by davila7Expert in building 3D experiences for the web - Three.js, React Three Fiber, Spline, WebGL, and interactive 3D scenes. Covers product configurators, 3D portfolios, immersive websites, and bringing depth to web experiences. Use when: 3D website, three.js, WebGL, react three fiber, 3D experience.★ 32.3k GitHub starsSkillSplit Test Setupdavila7/claude-code-templates · by davila7When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.★ 32.3k GitHub starsAgentResearch Literature Synthesizerdavila7/claude-code-templates · by davila7Academic research synthesis specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for comprehensive research on academic topics, literature reviews, technical investigations, and well-cited analysis combining multiple sources. <example>Context: A podcast episode needs a segment grounded in peer-reviewed evidence with formal citations. user: "Research the current state of transformer efficiency techniques for the episode, with proper academic citations." assistant: "I'll use the academic-research-synthesizer agent to search arXiv and Semantic Scholar, extract full-text findings via WebFetch, and produce a cited literature synthesis with confidence levels." <commentary>Use academic-research-synthesizer (not comprehensive-researcher) when the episode segment needs peer-reviewed sourcing, formal citation format, and explicit confidence tagging rather than general-purpose multi-source coverage.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The episode-orchestrator has routed a "literature review" request for a technical deep-dive segment. user: "Summarize the research landscape on federated learning privacy guarantees." assistant: "I'll invoke academic-research-synthesizer to systematically search academic sources, note peer-review status per source, and synthesize consensus vs. open debates."</example>★ 32.3k GitHub starsAgentAcademic Research Specialistdavila7/claude-code-templates · by davila7Academic research specialist for scholarly sources, peer-reviewed papers, and academic literature. Use PROACTIVELY for research paper analysis, literature reviews, citation tracking, and academic methodology evaluation. <example>Context: The research-orchestrator has kicked off Phase 4 parallel research on 'efficacy of intermittent fasting' and needs peer-reviewed evidence. user: "Find the academic evidence on intermittent fasting outcomes." assistant: "I'll use the academic-researcher agent to search Semantic Scholar, PubMed, and OpenAlex for peer-reviewed studies and write structured findings to academic-research.md." <commentary>The request is specifically for scholarly/peer-reviewed evidence rather than general web coverage or code, so academic-researcher (not web-researcher or technical-researcher) is the right specialist.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The user wants a literature review comparing methodologies across studies on a topic. user: "Can you review the literature on transformer model interpretability and identify research gaps?" assistant: "Let me invoke the academic-researcher agent to pull foundational and recent papers, extract methodologies, and surface open research gaps." <commentary>Literature review, methodology extraction, and research-gap identification are core academic-researcher capabilities, distinct from technical-researcher's focus on code repositories and implementations.</commentary></example>★ 32.3k GitHub stars