Parallel Execution Patterns
Patterns for parallel subagent execution using the Agent

Patterns for parallel subagent execution using the Agent tool (formerly Task). Use when coordinating multiple independent tasks, spawning dynamic subagents, or implementing features that can be parallelized.
--- name: parallel-execution description: Patterns for parallel subagent execution using the Agent tool (formerly Task). Use when coordinating multiple independent tasks, spawning dynamic subagents, or implementing features that can be parallelized. --- # Parallel Execution Patterns ### When to Load - **Trigger**: Multi-agent tasks, concurrent operations, spawning subagents, parallelizing independent work - **Skip**: Single-step tasks or sequential workflows with no parallelization opportunity ## Core Concept Parallel execution spawns multiple subagents simultaneously using the Agent tool (named `Task` before Claude Code 2.1.63; `Task` still works as an alias). Subagents run in the background by default, so N tasks run concurrently, dramatically reducing total execution time. **Critical Rule**: ALL Agent calls MUST be in a SINGLE assistant message for true parallelism. If the calls are in separate messages, they launch one after another.
Overview
Parallel execution spawns multiple subagents simultaneously using the Agent tool (named Task before Claude Code 2.1.63; Task still works as an alias). Subagents run in the background by default, so N tasks run concurrently, dramatically reducing total execution time.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add CloudAI-X/claude-workflow-v2 --skill parallel-execution -g -a claude-codenpx degit CloudAI-X/claude-workflow-v2/skills/parallel-execution#main ~/.claude/skills/parallel-executionConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md6.6 KB
Read SKILL.md here
Show the full text236 lines
Parallel Execution Patterns
When to Load
- Trigger: Multi-agent tasks, concurrent operations, spawning subagents, parallelizing independent work
- Skip: Single-step tasks or sequential workflows with no parallelization opportunity
Core Concept
Parallel execution spawns multiple subagents simultaneously using the Agent tool (named Task before Claude Code 2.1.63; Task still works as an alias). Subagents run in the background by default, so N tasks run concurrently, dramatically reducing total execution time.
Critical Rule: ALL Agent calls MUST be in a SINGLE assistant message for true parallelism. If the calls are in separate messages, they launch one after another.
Execution Protocol
Step 1: Identify Parallelizable Tasks
Before spawning, verify tasks are independent:
- No task depends on another's output
- Tasks target different files or concerns
- Can run simultaneously without conflicts
Step 2: Prepare Dynamic Subagent Prompts
Each subagent receives a custom prompt defining its role:
You are a [ROLE] specialist for this specific task.
Task: [CLEAR DESCRIPTION]
Context:
[RELEVANT CONTEXT ABOUT THE CODEBASE/PROJECT]
Files to work with:
[SPECIFIC FILES OR PATTERNS]
Output format:
[EXPECTED OUTPUT STRUCTURE]
Focus areas:
- [PRIORITY 1]
- [PRIORITY 2]
Step 3: Launch All Tasks in ONE Message
CRITICAL: Make ALL Agent calls in the SAME assistant message:
I'm launching N parallel subagents:
[Agent 1]
description: "Subagent A - [brief purpose]"
prompt: "[detailed instructions for subagent A]"
[Agent 2]
description: "Subagent B - [brief purpose]"
prompt: "[detailed instructions for subagent B]"
[Agent 3]
description: "Subagent C - [brief purpose]"
prompt: "[detailed instructions for subagent C]"
On Claude Code versions that still run subagents in the foreground by default, add run_in_background: true to each call.
Step 4: Collect Results
Each subagent returns its final result to the parent conversation automatically when it finishes. Wait until every subagent has reported before synthesizing; do not poll, and do not start dependent work early. (The separate TaskOutput call is deprecated.)
Step 5: Synthesize Results
Combine all subagent outputs into unified result:
- Merge related findings
- Resolve conflicts between recommendations
- Prioritize by severity/importance
- Create actionable summary
Dynamic Subagent Patterns
Pattern 1: Task-Based Parallelization
When you have N tasks to implement, spawn N subagents:
Plan:
1. Implement auth module
2. Create API endpoints
3. Add database schema
4. Write unit tests
5. Update documentation
Wave 1 - spawn 3 subagents (independent of each other):
- Subagent 1: Implements auth module
- Subagent 2: Creates API endpoints
- Subagent 3: Adds database schema
Wave 2 - after wave 1 has finished (these depend on its output):
- Subagent 4: Writes unit tests
- Subagent 5: Updates documentation
Pattern 2: Directory-Based Parallelization
Analyze multiple directories simultaneously:
Directories: src/auth, src/api, src/db
Spawn 3 subagents:
- Subagent 1: Analyzes src/auth
- Subagent 2: Analyzes src/api
- Subagent 3: Analyzes src/db
Pattern 3: Perspective-Based Parallelization
Review from multiple angles simultaneously:
Perspectives: Security, Performance, Testing, Architecture
Spawn 4 subagents:
- Subagent 1: Security review
- Subagent 2: Performance analysis
- Subagent 3: Test coverage review
- Subagent 4: Architecture assessment
Task List Integration
When using parallel execution, task tracking (TaskCreate/TaskUpdate, or TodoWrite on older versions) differs:
Sequential execution: Only ONE task in_progress at a time
Parallel execution: MULTIPLE tasks can be in_progress simultaneously
# Before launching parallel tasks
todos = [
{ content: "Task A", status: "in_progress" },
{ content: "Task B", status: "in_progress" },
{ content: "Task C", status: "in_progress" },
{ content: "Synthesize results", status: "pending" }
]
# As each subagent reports back, mark its task completed
todos = [
{ content: "Task A", status: "completed" },
{ content: "Task B", status: "completed" },
{ content: "Task C", status: "completed" },
{ content: "Synthesize results", status: "in_progress" }
]
When to Use Parallel Execution
Good candidates:
- Multiple independent analyses (code review, security, tests)
- Multi-file processing where files are independent
- Exploratory tasks with different perspectives
- Verification tasks with different checks
- Feature implementation with independent components
Avoid parallelization when:
- Tasks have dependencies (Task B needs Task A's output)
- Sequential workflows are required (commit -> push -> PR)
- Tasks modify the same files (risk of conflicts)
- Order matters for correctness
Performance Benefits
| Approach | 5 Tasks @ 30s each | Total Time |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential | 30s + 30s + 30s + 30s + 30s | ~150s |
| Parallel | All 5 run simultaneously | ~30s |
Parallel execution is approximately Nx faster where N is the number of independent tasks.
Example: Feature Implementation
User request: "Implement user authentication with login, registration, and password reset"
Orchestrator creates plan:
- Implement login endpoint
- Implement registration endpoint
- Implement password reset endpoint
- Add authentication middleware
- Write integration tests
Parallel execution:
Wave 1 - launching 4 subagents in parallel:
[Agent 1] Login endpoint implementation
[Agent 2] Registration endpoint implementation
[Agent 3] Password reset endpoint implementation
[Agent 4] Auth middleware implementation
[Results arrive as each subagent finishes]
Wave 2 - depends on wave 1:
[Agent 5] Integration test writing
[Synthesize into cohesive implementation]
Troubleshooting
Tasks running sequentially?
- Verify ALL Agent calls are in a SINGLE message
- On older Claude Code versions, check
run_in_background: trueis set for each
Results not available?
- Results are delivered when each subagent finishes; wait for all of them
- A subagent that was denied a permission may return without finishing its work; check its report
Conflicts in output?
- Ensure tasks don't modify same files
- Add conflict resolution in synthesis step
| 1 | |
| 2 | name parallel-execution |
| 3 | description Patterns for parallel subagent execution using the Agent tool (formerly Task). Use when coordinating multiple independent tasks, spawning dynamic subagents, or implementing features that can be parallelized. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Parallel Execution Patterns |
| 7 | |
| 8 | ### When to Load |
| 9 | |
| 10 | **Trigger**: Multi-agent tasks, concurrent operations, spawning subagents, parallelizing independent work |
| 11 | **Skip**: Single-step tasks or sequential workflows with no parallelization opportunity |
| 12 | |
| 13 | ## Core Concept |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Parallel execution spawns multiple subagents simultaneously using the Agent tool (named `Task` before Claude Code 2.1.63; `Task` still works as an alias). Subagents run in the background by default, so N tasks run concurrently, dramatically reducing total execution time. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | **Critical Rule**: ALL Agent calls MUST be in a SINGLE assistant message for true parallelism. If the calls are in separate messages, they launch one after another. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ## Execution Protocol |
| 20 | |
| 21 | ### Step 1: Identify Parallelizable Tasks |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Before spawning, verify tasks are independent: |
| 24 | |
| 25 | No task depends on another's output |
| 26 | Tasks target different files or concerns |
| 27 | Can run simultaneously without conflicts |
| 28 | |
| 29 | ### Step 2: Prepare Dynamic Subagent Prompts |
| 30 | |
| 31 | Each subagent receives a custom prompt defining its role: |
| 32 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | You are a [ROLE] specialist for this specific task. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | Task: [CLEAR DESCRIPTION] |
| 37 | |
| 38 | Context: |
| 39 | [RELEVANT CONTEXT ABOUT THE CODEBASE/PROJECT] |
| 40 | |
| 41 | Files to work with: |
| 42 | [SPECIFIC FILES OR PATTERNS] |
| 43 | |
| 44 | Output format: |
| 45 | [EXPECTED OUTPUT STRUCTURE] |
| 46 | |
| 47 | Focus areas: |
| 48 | - [PRIORITY 1] |
| 49 | - [PRIORITY 2] |
| 50 | |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### Step 3: Launch All Tasks in ONE Message |
| 53 | |
| 54 | **CRITICAL**: Make ALL Agent calls in the SAME assistant message: |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | I'm launching N parallel subagents: |
| 58 | |
| 59 | [Agent 1] |
| 60 | description: "Subagent A - [brief purpose]" |
| 61 | prompt: "[detailed instructions for subagent A]" |
| 62 | |
| 63 | [Agent 2] |
| 64 | description: "Subagent B - [brief purpose]" |
| 65 | prompt: "[detailed instructions for subagent B]" |
| 66 | |
| 67 | [Agent 3] |
| 68 | description: "Subagent C - [brief purpose]" |
| 69 | prompt: "[detailed instructions for subagent C]" |
| 70 | |
| 71 | |
| 72 | On Claude Code versions that still run subagents in the foreground by default, add `run_in_background: true` to each call. |
| 73 | |
| 74 | ### Step 4: Collect Results |
| 75 | |
| 76 | Each subagent returns its final result to the parent conversation automatically when it finishes. Wait until every subagent has reported before synthesizing; do not poll, and do not start dependent work early. (The separate `TaskOutput` call is deprecated.) |
| 77 | |
| 78 | ### Step 5: Synthesize Results |
| 79 | |
| 80 | Combine all subagent outputs into unified result: |
| 81 | |
| 82 | Merge related findings |
| 83 | Resolve conflicts between recommendations |
| 84 | Prioritize by severity/importance |
| 85 | Create actionable summary |
| 86 | |
| 87 | ## Dynamic Subagent Patterns |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ### Pattern 1: Task-Based Parallelization |
| 90 | |
| 91 | When you have N tasks to implement, spawn N subagents: |
| 92 | |
| 93 | |
| 94 | Plan: |
| 95 | 1. Implement auth module |
| 96 | 2. Create API endpoints |
| 97 | 3. Add database schema |
| 98 | 4. Write unit tests |
| 99 | 5. Update documentation |
| 100 | |
| 101 | Wave 1 - spawn 3 subagents (independent of each other): |
| 102 | - Subagent 1: Implements auth module |
| 103 | - Subagent 2: Creates API endpoints |
| 104 | - Subagent 3: Adds database schema |
| 105 | |
| 106 | Wave 2 - after wave 1 has finished (these depend on its output): |
| 107 | - Subagent 4: Writes unit tests |
| 108 | - Subagent 5: Updates documentation |
| 109 | |
| 110 | |
| 111 | ### Pattern 2: Directory-Based Parallelization |
| 112 | |
| 113 | Analyze multiple directories simultaneously: |
| 114 | |
| 115 | |
| 116 | Directories: src/auth, src/api, src/db |
| 117 | |
| 118 | Spawn 3 subagents: |
| 119 | - Subagent 1: Analyzes src/auth |
| 120 | - Subagent 2: Analyzes src/api |
| 121 | - Subagent 3: Analyzes src/db |
| 122 | |
| 123 | |
| 124 | ### Pattern 3: Perspective-Based Parallelization |
| 125 | |
| 126 | Review from multiple angles simultaneously: |
| 127 | |
| 128 | |
| 129 | Perspectives: Security, Performance, Testing, Architecture |
| 130 | |
| 131 | Spawn 4 subagents: |
| 132 | - Subagent 1: Security review |
| 133 | - Subagent 2: Performance analysis |
| 134 | - Subagent 3: Test coverage review |
| 135 | - Subagent 4: Architecture assessment |
| 136 | |
| 137 | |
| 138 | ## Task List Integration |
| 139 | |
| 140 | When using parallel execution, task tracking (`TaskCreate`/`TaskUpdate`, or `TodoWrite` on older versions) differs: |
| 141 | |
| 142 | **Sequential execution**: Only ONE task `in_progress` at a time |
| 143 | **Parallel execution**: MULTIPLE tasks can be `in_progress` simultaneously |
| 144 | |
| 145 | |
| 146 | # Before launching parallel tasks |
| 147 | todos = [ |
| 148 | { content: "Task A", status: "in_progress" }, |
| 149 | { content: "Task B", status: "in_progress" }, |
| 150 | { content: "Task C", status: "in_progress" }, |
| 151 | { content: "Synthesize results", status: "pending" } |
| 152 | ] |
| 153 | |
| 154 | # As each subagent reports back, mark its task completed |
| 155 | todos = [ |
| 156 | { content: "Task A", status: "completed" }, |
| 157 | { content: "Task B", status: "completed" }, |
| 158 | { content: "Task C", status: "completed" }, |
| 159 | { content: "Synthesize results", status: "in_progress" } |
| 160 | ] |
| 161 | |
| 162 | |
| 163 | ## When to Use Parallel Execution |
| 164 | |
| 165 | **Good candidates:** |
| 166 | |
| 167 | Multiple independent analyses (code review, security, tests) |
| 168 | Multi-file processing where files are independent |
| 169 | Exploratory tasks with different perspectives |
| 170 | Verification tasks with different checks |
| 171 | Feature implementation with independent components |
| 172 | |
| 173 | **Avoid parallelization when:** |
| 174 | |
| 175 | Tasks have dependencies (Task B needs Task A's output) |
| 176 | Sequential workflows are required (commit -> push -> PR) |
| 177 | Tasks modify the same files (risk of conflicts) |
| 178 | Order matters for correctness |
| 179 | |
| 180 | ## Performance Benefits |
| 181 | |
| 182 | | Approach | 5 Tasks @ 30s each | Total Time | |
| 183 | | ---------- | --------------------------- | ---------- | |
| 184 | | Sequential | 30s + 30s + 30s + 30s + 30s | ~150s | |
| 185 | | Parallel | All 5 run simultaneously | ~30s | |
| 186 | |
| 187 | Parallel execution is approximately Nx faster where N is the number of independent tasks. |
| 188 | |
| 189 | ## Example: Feature Implementation |
| 190 | |
| 191 | **User request**: "Implement user authentication with login, registration, and password reset" |
| 192 | |
| 193 | **Orchestrator creates plan**: |
| 194 | |
| 195 | Implement login endpoint |
| 196 | Implement registration endpoint |
| 197 | Implement password reset endpoint |
| 198 | Add authentication middleware |
| 199 | Write integration tests |
| 200 | |
| 201 | **Parallel execution**: |
| 202 | |
| 203 | |
| 204 | Wave 1 - launching 4 subagents in parallel: |
| 205 | |
| 206 | [Agent 1] Login endpoint implementation |
| 207 | [Agent 2] Registration endpoint implementation |
| 208 | [Agent 3] Password reset endpoint implementation |
| 209 | [Agent 4] Auth middleware implementation |
| 210 | |
| 211 | [Results arrive as each subagent finishes] |
| 212 | |
| 213 | Wave 2 - depends on wave 1: |
| 214 | |
| 215 | [Agent 5] Integration test writing |
| 216 | |
| 217 | [Synthesize into cohesive implementation] |
| 218 | |
| 219 | |
| 220 | ## Troubleshooting |
| 221 | |
| 222 | **Tasks running sequentially?** |
| 223 | |
| 224 | Verify ALL Agent calls are in a SINGLE message |
| 225 | On older Claude Code versions, check `run_in_background: true` is set for each |
| 226 | |
| 227 | **Results not available?** |
| 228 | |
| 229 | Results are delivered when each subagent finishes; wait for all of them |
| 230 | A subagent that was denied a permission may return without finishing its work; check its report |
| 231 | |
| 232 | **Conflicts in output?** |
| 233 | |
| 234 | Ensure tasks don't modify same files |
| 235 | Add conflict resolution in synthesis step |
| 236 |
Details
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 1,416
- Checked
- Source
- CloudAI-X/claude-workflow-v2 ↗
- Creator
- CloudAI-X · 14 listings
Similar skills
See all →
SkillBrowser Testing Suite
AgentEverything MCP
AgentWeb Content Fetcher
AgentFilesystem Operations
SkillLibrary Reference Tool
SkillChrome DevTools DebuggerMore from CloudAI-X
SkillDatabase Schema & Indexing
AgentDebugging Specialist
SkillAPI Design & Documentation
SkillTest Design & Coverage
SkillInfrastructure as Code Guide
AgentTechnical Documentation Specialist